Contact Us

Fill in the contact form opposite and we will get back to you shortly. Alternatively use the contact details listed below
02921 845852
wcrc@cardiff.ac.uk
Wales Cancer Research Centre,
Room 1TB2 31,
First Floor Main Building,
University Hospital of Wales,
Cardiff, CF14 4XN
News
26 Feb

‘Game changing’ test can predict how people with leukaemia will respond to chemotherapy

Chromosome

The first test to quickly and accurately predict how people will respond to standard treatment for the most common type of leukaemia has been developed by our staff at Cardiff University. The technology could guide doctors’ decisions on which drugs to give to patients.

The Cardiff researchers say that the test could now be a ‘game changer’ in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). It also has the potential to change how other cancers, including myeloma and breast cancer, are treated. While previous versions of the test had taken a week to process, results can now be ready in a day.

The research, which was funded by the blood cancer research charity Bloodwise, is published the journal Leukemia.

CLL is a slowly developing blood cancer in which patients produce mutated versions of white blood cells that build up in the blood, bone marrow and lymph nodes and crowd out healthy blood cells.

CLL progresses at different rates in different people and never progresses at all in a third of patients.  Until now there has been no accurate test that can be used to indicate whether and how fast individual patients’ cancers will develop.

The high-throughput ‘STELA’ test developed in Cardiff measures the length of sections of DNA in cancer cells called telomeres, which are found at the end of chromosomes. Telomeres act in the same way as protective plastic tips on the end of shoelaces, preventing chromosomes ends from ‘fraying’.  

Telomeres shorten every time a cell divides to create a new cell and eventually the chromosome ends are left exposed – leading to extensive DNA damage that speeds up cancer progression.

The Cardiff researchers have shown that people who have very short telomeres when they are diagnosed are much more likely to have a fast-progressing cancer. 

The improved STELA test was used to analyse samples from 260 patients to see if it could predict how patients would respond to chemotherapy.  The test showed that people with short telomeres who received chemotherapy relapsed much sooner than patients with long telomeres – on average 3.7 years after treatment compared to 5.5 years.   

Patients with cancer cells containing mutations to the IGHV gene are known to have a better outcome that patients without this genetic mutation. The STELA test was found to be a more accurate predictor of relapse after chemotherapy than testing for the IGHV mutation or any other current prognostic or predictive test.

Professor Duncan Baird leads our cancer genetic and genomic instability research. He developed the test at Cardiff University’s School of Medicine with Professors Chris Pepper and Chris Fegan, said: “Not all patients benefit equally from chemotherapy and this test is the only one available that can accurately predict how patients are likely to respond. Our research provides strong evidence that a significant number of patients should be receiving more appropriate treatments.”

Professor Chris Pepper, who is now based at Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, said: “Our study shows that some patients have a very long duration of response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and may even be cured. These patients all have long telomeres. In contrast, patients with short telomeres invariably showed an inferior response and should be considered for alternative treatments.”

Dr Alasdair Rankin, Director of Research at Bloodwise, said: “People with CLL can experience great anxiety and uncertainty about how their cancer will progress. This test could give people the peace of mind that they will receive the most effective treatment possible if it does. It may even allow some people to be told that their cancer is unlikely to progress.”

The paper can be read at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-019-0389-9